Plants, Gardens, Musings and More
  • Life in Plants
  • Portraits
  • Contact
  • About this Blog

Foxes and bulbs don't mix well

24/2/2016

7 Comments

 
Picture
Crocus Jeanne d' Arc with some blue grape hyacinths (Muscari)
This is what the bowl full of crocus Jeanne d'Arc on my patio should look like now. It looked like this last year and the year before, and I liked it well enough to plant it up in that fashion again - for a similar display this spring. However, we since have acquired if not an entirely new neighbour than at least one who pops round much more frequently now and inflicts more damage to my garden. No, not some old clumsy who steps on things, or someone who damages deliberately out of mischief. It's an urban fox and it has become a bit of a pest.

This being inner London, we've had foxes coming round before, of course. Never until I moved to this city had I seen that many of them. Quite often you encounter foxes here in broad daylight and, to be honest, I'm actually quite partial to them. I used to love observing them from my bedroom window at night, thinking how strange and wonderful in some ways it is that they follow man (or rather: his food) into the built up environment. Our road has no trees, all asphalt and concrete. Gardens are tiny and hidden behind high walls, most of them paved over to become patios or parking spaces or are more or less neglected grassy patches.

Up until watching it myself though, I would not have believed foxes capable of scaling walls more than two metres high and balancing like a cat on fences no more than 4 cm wide. Our small patio garden is enclosed by these on all sides, and often we have observed a fully grown animal trotting along our boundaries, seeming astonished rather than scared when we flashed the torch at them. Hesitating, as if unsure whether to continue in its tracks or not, making a hasty retreat or swift exit only if we made loud noises: ordinary shooing certainly did not seem to bother it.
Picture
Rather brazen urban fox - here at Kew Gardens, London.
And of course I have seen them sniffing around on the ground in our garden, too, before and did not mind all that much except for the very occasional fox poo left behind and the fact that we didn't want them to become regulars because of their plundering the blackbird's nest in the neighbours' garden as happened thrice before. (And quite a drama it was!)

But last autumn a newcomer seems to have arrived who decided our garden was its declared foraging territory for snails, slugs and earthworms - and whatever else foxes feed on apart from leftover sandwiches, chips, fleshy fried chicken bones and the rest of urban goodies. So now I find not just the soil from the beds scratched and spilled onto the patio slabs but, more annoyingly, the planted-up pots rummaged through.

Especially the bulbs and the houseleeks (Sempervivum) are uprooted, dug out, strewn around and left to rot and freeze - or to dry and shrivel, depending on the weather - if I don't notice immediately. At first I suspected the blackbirds, but I don't think they could do that much damage - and why would they change their behaviour all of a sudden. When some pots were knocked over this seemed to finally prove it.
Picture
Same bowl, one year on: I must have re-planted the crocus bulbs twenty times at least - to no avail
What to do about it? Well, I tried putting prickly branches  on top of the pots. Namely twigs of holly (Ilex) and rose prunings. It did seem to help a bit but I probably did not have nearly enough of them. Now the damage is done - at least concerning the crocus bowl and some lilies. Next autumn, I'll try and get more prickly bits to protect my bulb pots.

I've heard people recommend leaving dog hair around, the assumption being that the smell would scare the foxes off. I don't have a dog. Neither do people whom I know well enough to ask if they could regularly shear their four-legged friend for my garden's benefit. Because you'd have to renew the dog hair regularly, won't you? I suppose it would be blown about and lose its "trade mark dog smell" pretty soon if left in the open. Truth be told - I very much doubt any London fox would care about a bit of unaccompanied hair, fresh or not. My guess is that even a barking dog behind a glass door wouldn't put them off for long.

Apart from that, I try to be philosophical about it. So far, the damage is not threatening my gardening and while not exactly happy, I can live it. Gardening in this inner urban and very enclosed space, I don't have badgers or moles to content with, for instance, nor - as my sister in a rural setting has - with roe which regularly come to nibble off every single rosebud just as they are about to unfurl. As I said, I don't have a dog to regularly patrol and scent-mark the plot and so far wouldn't dream of using more drastic measures to rid my garden of the foxes.

Picture
There go the lilies... a fox-ravaged pot of bulbs after the attack

Though it may not count as "proper gardening", I think I will treat myself to potted lilies in bud from Columbia Road Flower Market this year. 
And next time I grumble when re-potting those alpine gentians or houseleeks, I'll try to recall that night a few years ago when I observed three or four fox cubs playing. The builders had left a pile of insulation wool across the road and these cubs were using it to slide down the soft heap again and again and again for what seemed like hours. Just like toddlers in a playground! The sight would have made anyone's heart melt.
7 Comments

Dope for the flower-starved: From Monet to Matisse

10/2/2016

4 Comments

 
Colours, light, flowers - what more could you want on a dull, grey and stormy day? I had really looked forward to the Royal Academy's exhibition "Painting the Modern Garden: Monet to Matisse". How often do you get to see so many paintings on a favourite subject - gardens - together in one place? But boy, it was crowded! To put on a show like that, at this time of year, is genius on the part of the Royal Academy and proves a real magnet to the public. There is little chance to contemplate the pictures whilst being shoved around and queuing up to see the smaller ones. Never mind, I did get to see them all and I'm glad I went.

Given the title, I was surprised there were so few "Matisse's": only two, if I remember correctly. If you love Monet, on the other hand, this exhibition delivers! So many wonderful works, so many of his famous water lily paintings hung side by side! Usually, when you go to a museum you'll see one or two and might like them - but they are sort of isolated. Here, however, you really get to see the differences in the mood, the time of day and changing light as reflected on that pond surface!

Picture
One of Monet's water-lily pond paintings. Image taken from the Royal Academy's website
Aside from Monet, what I liked best was seeing paintings of artists I had heard of little if anything before. While this, of course, is entirely due to my own ignorance in art history, I loved discovering "new" painters and none more so than Spaniard Joaquin Sorolla (1863 - 1923) and Gustave Caillebotte (1848 - 1894). Caillebotte's paintings in particular struck me as incredibly modern - more so, in fact, than even Monet at this time. 

The official "highlight of the exhibition", if you can term it thus, is a triptych of Water-lily paintings, one of them misleadingly called Agapanthus (there are none in it). If I understood correctly (I might not), they are shown together publicly in Europe for the first time since their creation. The three panels seen as an entity are wonderful, but my favourites were in the previous room: There are, for instance, two amazing pictures of the Japanese Bridge in Monet's water garden at Giverny - in a fabulous palette of brilliant and vibrant autumn hues.


Picture
My 5 year-old's interpretation of Gustav Klimt's "Cottage Garden"...

If pressed though, I think my favourite Monet  picture from the exhibition is Daylilies in that same room. The flowers, though clearly identifiable as daylilies, seem to flutter like bright orange butterflies over the blue-green waters of the pond which has a depth of colour you are more likely to associate with myth or a jungle lagoon than a garden pond. The whole picture has this incredible glow.

Having purchased the catalogue to the exhibition afterwards, I was disappointed to see how dull by comparison the reproduction was - nothing of that glow and sparkle, that vivid yet mysterious freshness! That, of course, goes for many reproductions in print. "On paper" just is no match for the real thing! As far as this exhibition goes - we Londoners and those within travelling distance really are a lucky bunch.

That said, the catalogue promises to be an interesting and insightful read and - with the above mentioned shortcomings - is a gorgeous feast for any gardener's and art lover's eyes. So if you can't make it to London in person before the 20th of April, the Royal Academy offers it in its online-shop.


If you are interested in learning more about the exhibition and my thoughts on it, please read on below.
Picture
... and the reproduction of a reproduction: A photo I took from the catalogue

Whilst "Painting the Modern Garden: Monet to Matisse" helped me experience how Monet's style as a painter developed over the years, I found it more difficult to follow the overall narrative arc of the exhibition. It is subdivided into "Impressionist Gardens", "International Gardens" (to show painting flowers and gardens was part of a broader movement in art), "Monet's Early Years at Giverny", "Gardens of Silence", "Avant-Gardens", "Gardens of Reverie" and finally "Monet's later Years at Giverny".

Despite text panels describing what each section stood for, I was not convinced. Monet, referred to as the ultimate artist-gardener, was elsewhere described as being avant-garde in the laying out of his garden at Giverny, compared to the dominant fashion of the time. But he did not feature in the "Avant-Garden" section. Nor in the "Gardens of Silence" - described as "gardens devoid of human presence". But what, if not silence, convey the water-lily pictures? Quite apart from other "unpeopled" garden paintings found in e.g. the "international" section. It seems to me, there is a general mix-up of art history and garden history: Avant-Garden here is understood in terms of avant-garde (i.e. experimental/ expressionist) art, but not in terms of gardening.


Picture
My 9 year-old opted for Monet's "Weeping Willow"...
Similarly, after "Monet's Early Years at Giverny" there is a room called "Making of a Garden" which I feel sits rather awkwardly or at least oddly in there. In display cases (made to look like Victorian cold frames) letters, books, journals, photographs and documents are exhibited that refer to Monet's creation of his garden. You can, for instance, see a catalogue of the specialist nursery from which he obtained his modern water-lily hybrids, or a magazine with an article by his head gardener about irises. There are letters by Monet and his friend to the Prefect of the river Eure, pleading for permission to divert water from the river to fill the artist's newly created pond garden. (Locals had objected, fearing his "aquatic plants" would poison the water and their cattle.) 

While the presentation in this room is lovely and the "artefacts" interesting in themselves, I felt that the curators couldn't make up their mind whether they wanted the show to be about horticulture or art. For someone not familiar with garden history, there is, for instance, little to link books by William Robinson and a painting of Gertrude Jekyll's gardening boots with the rest. The explanations given are no more than a hint of a link. Can you really take it for granted that every visitor knows about Gertrude Jekyll? That she, having been trained as an artist herself, went on to became the most influential garden designer of her time, combining colours in the flower border with a subtlety and harmony like no one else before - influencing, presumably, Monet and his painter friends (or being part of the broader artistic movement herself)? 

Somehow I can't help thinking that, being incredibly ambitious in their scope, the curators tried to bite off more than they could chew. There is, to my mind, at once too little information (to link and explain) and too much (in terms of painters covered by the show).
I believe it would have been better to either focus on some very few artist-gardeners and go into more detail about how they created their gardens and what and whom they were influence by (i.e. the social and horticultural developments of the time). And then show how these gardens were reflected in their paintings.
Or else take a "classic art history approach" and show a very broad movement of painters turning to gardens and plants as their subject matter and how these found expression in all sorts of styles - from very traditional, "old-school" depictions to impressionism to expressionism, Art Noveau etc.
. 

Picture
... which in the catalogue looked something like this.

Perhaps I should stress again that my argument above refers to the exhibition as a “stand-alone” thing, with no information above what is provided in the rooms. There are, however, numerous articles and blog posts on the Royal Academy’s website and the catalogue to read (if you are willing to shell out for it).

What one should do, of course, is to attend the free events and talks accompanying the Royal Academy's exhibition. They not only drafted in the great and the good of garden design (Dan Pearson, Tom Stuart-Smith, Sarah Price in a discussion with artist Stephen Farthing, led by Tim Richardson), but those that seem best suited to address the "missing links" mentioned above: Garden Designer and writer James Alexander-Sinclair discusses with James Priest, current head gardener at Giverny, the relationship between Monet's horticulture and his art. Clare A.P. Willsdon of the University of Glasgow explores the link between art and horticulture with special emphasis on the 19th century. And Dr Eric Haskell highlights the relationship between Monet's gardening aesthetic and his painterly technique.
Frustratingly though, every single one of these talks and discussions is marked as "fully booked" in the gallery guide already! And I'm not one to book events half a year in advance...


          The garden as a refuge and retreat: are there any parallels to today?

Aside from the above though, and the sheer, life-affirming joy of seeing this exuberance of flowers and gardens, there was something in the exhibition that struck a chord. Almost every introductory panel talked about the garden being seen as a refuge, as "offering a vital means of reconnecting with nature in an age of rapid industrialisation": "By the turn of the century, the desire for a verdant retreat from the ills of urban life had become an international phenomenon." Did curator Ann Dumas see a parallel to our own day and age, I wonder?

Whilst the digital age may not be so much about the physical expansion of cities, about the disfigurement and pollution of sites, there certainly is a merciless onslaught today in terms of speed and information (as well as entertainment available) - and the accompanying pressures on life in all spheres. Are we at the dawn of a general yearning for a stop button, a simpler, slower life already? A desire to go back to nature, back into the garden? Are there any signs for this to be found in the arts today? Now that would make for an interesting discussion!

Oh, and on a lighter note and in a quirky twist I thought how strangely similar the artists of Monet's day looked to today’s “hipsters” with their profuse facial hair and their interest in all things "crafty" :-) .

4 Comments

    About the Author,
    Stefanie


    Born and raised in East Berlin, Germany. Has moved a few miles west since, to East London. Gardening since childhood, though first attempts were in what should properly be described a sandpit (yes, Brandenburg’s soil is that poor). After 15 years of indoor-only gardening has upgraded via a small roof terrace to a patio plot crammed with pots. Keeps dreaming about a big garden, possibly with a bit of woodland, a traditional orchard and a walled garden plus a greenhouse or two. Unlikely to happen in this lifetime - but hey, you can always dream.



    Categories

    All
    Books
    Indoor Gardening
    Musings
    My Garden
    Out And About
    Plants In Art And Crafts
    Science And Stuff

    Archives

    May 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    November 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly